As companies finalise their compliance preparations ahead of Australia’s privacy law reforms taking effect in March 2014, the Privacy Commissioner has released its guidelines to the new Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). The long-awaited final version of the APP guidelines represent welcome guidance as to how the Privacy Commissioner will interpret the APPs and what “good privacy practice” will look like from 12 March 2014.
The guidance remains, in many respects, the same as in the draft version released for public consultation in August 2013. However, there are some noteworthy differences, including further explanation of the key concepts that underpin the APPs and practical tips for implementing a privacy compliance program. These include:
The APP guidelines provide some practical guidance on how companies can notify individuals of the collection of personal information under new APP 5. These include:
The important compliance principle to remember is that the notice must be clearly expressed, cover all the matters listed in APP 5 and provided either prior to or at the point of collection of personal information (or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter).
One of the key concepts underpinning the new APPs relates to the giving of consent by an individual: where an individual’s consent is required for a particular handling of their personal information, consent must be given voluntarily. This generally precludes a company from “bundling consent” (the guidelines explain that this refers to “bundling” together multiple requests for consent to a wide range of dealings with their personal information, without giving the individual the opportunity to choose which dealings they agree to, and which they do not).
The position is now clarified: analytical information collected by cookies (for example, number of times a page is visited and other information collected through the use of Google Analytics and similar tools) will not be personal information for the purposes of the Privacy Act, unless the individual is reasonably identifiable. Companies will still need to exercise caution (and comply with their privacy obligations) when using cookies and other web-tracking tools that do enable an individual to be reasonably identified.
Online behavioural advertising is the use of an individual’s web-behavioural data (collected by cookies) for the purposes of displaying online targeted advertising to that individual. This practice is becoming increasingly common on social media sites.
The guidelines retain the explanation that online behavioural advertising practices that use personal information will be “direct marketing” for the purposes of new APP 7. (Displaying an advertisement on a website, where it will be viewed by all visitors to that website, and is not targeted to a particular individual using that individual’s personal information, is not direct marketing).
The guidelines clarify what has been a point of concern for many: where a company’s systems are hacked or otherwise subject to unauthorised access by a third party, this will not amount to disclosure by the company (and the company will not be on the hook for non-compliance with the APPs). However, this will only be the case where the company has taken reasonable steps to protect the security of the personal information it holds. The guidelines provide detailed comments as to what “reasonable steps” will be for the purposes of new APP 11 (security of personal information).
Unfortunately, there are a few points of interpretation that have not been further clarified (despite submissions during the public consultation phase).
In particular, the guidelines do not offer any further clarification in respect of cloud computing, in particular, the point at which the use of a cloud service becomes an offshore data transfer. The guidelines maintain the comments contained in the draft version: that is, there are certain circumstances in which the use of an offshore cloud-based service to store personal information may not amount to “disclosure” of personal information (but rather a “use” of personal information). These circumstances generally require a company to make an assessment as to its retained level of control of the data stored in the cloud. For anyone who has negotiated a cloud service agreement, this can be a difficult assessment to make. Given that the company would be accountable for a breach of the APPs by its cloud service provider (if the service was found to, in fact, amount to an offshore disclosure), relying on the guidelines as a basis for not complying with APP 8, seems risky at this early (and untested) stage of the reforms.
Another area that we had hoped to see some clarification was the interaction between the direct marketing requirements in APP 7 and other direct marketing-related laws and regulations, including the Spam Act 2003 and Do Not Call Register Act 2006. APP 7.8 provides that the principle in APP 7 does not apply “to the extent that” these other laws apply. Some further guidance as to the meaning of “to the extent that” would have been welcomed, particularly for companies with large and sophisticated direct marketing functions that already have spam compliance programs in place and are looking to streamline compliance programs across digital, telephony, mobile and hard copy marketing channels.
As with any substantive change in law and regulation, we will need to wait and see how the Privacy Commissioner applies the APPs and exercises its new (and extended) powers under the reformed Privacy Act. It is also important to bear in mind that the APPs are principles-based law and the APP guidelines cannot be relied on as legal advice. That said, for companies looking to finalise (or indeed commence) a privacy compliance program, the final version of the APP guidelines could not have come sooner.
The APP Guidelines are available on the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner’s website here.
If you would like assistance with implementing your privacy compliance program, please contact a member of the Corrs Privacy Reforms Working Group in your local Corrs office.
The content of this publication is for reference purposes only. It is current at the date of publication. This content does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be obtained before taking any action based on this publication.