Following the United States’ presidential election in 2016, the prospects of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) entering into force have faded.
The trade deal already faced fierce resistance from a divided US Congress and, although largely symbolic, on 23 January 2017 President Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the United States from the trade deal following his inauguration. The implications of the stalled trade deal are yet to be realised, but there are significant lessons to take away from the investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS) chapter with respect to both the enforcement mechanism and the substantive rights granted to foreign investors under the ISDS provisions.
You can access a copy of The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Lessons Learned for ISDS here, or click the ‘DOWNLOAD PDF’ button.
This article was originally published in The Investment Treaty Arbitration Review Second Edition, and has been reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. For further information please visit: http://thelawreviews.co.uk/
This publication is introductory in nature. Its content is current at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should always obtain legal advice based on your specific circumstances before taking any action relating to matters covered by this publication. Some information may have been obtained from external sources, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or currency of any such information.