Home Insights Australia as a Technology and Financial Centre: unpacking the final report into the digital asset sector
Share

Australia as a Technology and Financial Centre: unpacking the final report into the digital asset sector

The final report on Australia as a Technology and Financial Centre outlines a comprehensive and ambitious plan for Australia to lead the digital assets and blockchain era.  

In October 2021, the Senate Select Committee on Australia as a Technology and Financial Centre (Committee) released its final report (Report). 

Background to the Report

The Report (here) represents the final phase of the Committee’s inquiry into key areas affecting the competitiveness of Australia’s technology, finance and digital asset industries. The Committee has previously published interim reports on financial and regulatory technology, including the impact of COVID-19 on technological change, tax incentives, the Consumer Data Right, and skills and talent.

The key purpose of the Report was to focus on financial technology, such as the regulation of cryptocurrencies and digital assets, and the access of fintechs to financial services.

The Government is yet to provide its formal position on the Report. If the Government were to adopt one or more of the Report’s recommendations, it could have a significant impact on the Australian fintech landscape and the financial institutions, fintechs and other businesses looking to benefit from digital assets, decentralised blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies.

Some of the recommendations build on the findings of other recent inquiries into payments system including the Payments System Review (read Corrs’s Insight on the Payments System Review here).

The Australian Government may choose to consider these recommendations as part of the broader design of its financial system policies.

Key takeaways  

The Report makes 12 recommendations.

New Digital Currency Exchange Market License category  

  • The Report recommends the Government establishes a new market licence regime for Digital Currency Exchanges (DCE). This will supplement the current AUSTRAC “light touch” registration process.[1] It would be separate to the current Australian market licence regime in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act).

  • The new DCE market licence regime would include, at a minimum, requirements on capital adequacy, auditing and responsible person tests to ensure operational integrity and consumer protection.[2] 

Custody or Depository Regime for Digital Assets

  • It is recommended in the Report that the Government implements a custody or depository regime for digital assets with minimum standards.[3] The Report notes that there are unique vulnerabilities relating to custody of digital assets and currently there are limited consumer protections in place for custody services provided for consumers holding crypto-assets.

A new company form, ‘Decentralised Autonomous Organisation’, should be recognised in the Corporations Act

  • A new legal structure, the ‘Decentralised Autonomous Organisation’ (DAO), is recommended in the Report to be introduced in the Corporations Act. A DAO structure operates on decentralised blockchain infrastructure, with operations pre-determined in open source code and enforced through smart contracts. If this recommendation was adopted, it would give DAO separate legal entity status, and will enable large scale DAO projects to be established in Australia with greater legal certainty for the members.

  • The proposed DAO structure recognises the rapid uptake of decentralised finance applications and other blockchain projects that are typically set up with a decentralised ownership structure. ‘Decentralised finance’ is an umbrella term for a financial system which functions without intermediaries and is operated by smart contracts and challenges the traditional forms of finance.

Review of the viability of a Central Bank Digital Currency in Australia

  • To keep the options open for future development in digital currency, the Report recommends that the Treasury leads a policy review of the viability of a retail Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) in Australia. Such a review would build on existing work the RBA is undertaking which explores options for a wholesale CBDC. To date, the RBA has not seen a public policy case for implementing a retail CBDC in Australia.

Access to banking services

  • The Report recognises that “de-banking” of fintechs is a complex problem occurring for a number of reasons, including regulatory arrangements and penalties for non-compliance with AML/CTF laws.[4]

  • The Report recommends that AML/CTF laws be clarified to ensure they are fit for purpose, do not undermine innovation, and give consideration to the driver of the Financial Action Task Force’s 'travel rule’ (a rule that requires virtual asset service providers to obtain, hold and exchange information about the originators and beneficiaries of virtual asset transfers).[5]

  • The Report agrees with the final report on the Payments System Review that the Reserve Bank of Australia should develop a set of common access requirements for the New Payments Platform.[6]

  • It is recommended in the Report that a clear process for businesses that have been de-banked should be established including through access to Australian Financial Complaints Authority jurisdiction.[7]

Clearer CGT treatment and favourable tax incentives for use of renewable energy in ‘mining’ the assets 

  • The Committee recommends in the Report that the CGT regime is made clearer so that digital asset transactions only create CGT events where they genuinely result in a clearly definable capital gain or loss.[8]

  • To incentivise sustainable crypto-mining activity in Australia, the Report recommends that businesses undertaking digital asset ‘mining’ and related activities in Australia should receive a 10% company tax discount where renewable energy is used in these activities.[9]

ASIC’s new guidance on crypto-asset exchange traded products and other investment products

Since the publication of the Committee’s final report, ASIC has independently published Information Sheet 225 Crypto-assets and Information Sheet 230 Exchange traded products: Admission guidelines (Info Sheets). The Info Sheets set out what ASIC considers to be good practices principles relating to product issuers and market operators on meeting their regulatory obligations in relation to crypto-asset exchange traded products and other investment products.

What happens next?

The Australian Government may choose to provide its formal position on the recommendations made in the Report. It may do so as part of a broader response to other recent inquiries into the regulation of the Australian payments system.

For now, the industry must watch and wait for the outcome.


[1] Report, recommendation 1.

[2] Report, [6.14 & 6.15].

[3] Report, recommendation 2.

[4] Report, [6.65]

[6] Report, recommendation 11.

[7] Report, recommendation 10.

[8] Report, recommendation 6.

[9] Report, recommendation 7.


Authors

ARDRA Mizu SMALL
Mizu Ardra

Special Counsel

Chenjie Ma

Senior Associate


Tags

Banking and Financial Services Government

This publication is introductory in nature. Its content is current at the date of publication. It does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. You should always obtain legal advice based on your specific circumstances before taking any action relating to matters covered by this publication. Some information may have been obtained from external sources, and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or currency of any such information.

Share
  • Print article