Proportionate liability in the building and construction industry following Hunt & Hunt v Mitchell Morgan


Proportionate liability, as it is utilised across Australian jurisdictions, remains an ineffective means of allocating risk despite the ambitious attempt to make damages awarded against multiple defendants more equitable.

This article examines the development of the proportionate liability regime focussing on how it applies to the building and construction industry, particularly in light of the recent High Court of Australia decision in Hunt & Hunt v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd.

The High Court decision has confirmed the role that the statutory proportionate liability regime has in disputes with multiple parties causing the loss claimed. It is the first judgment handed down by the High Court that involves a detailed analysis of the proportionate liability regime, the New South Wales legislation in particular. The decision clarifies the meaning of ‘damage or loss that is the subject of the claim’ in the legislation and further use of ‘damage’ in the legislative provisions.

Click 'Download' to view the full article.

The content of this publication is for reference purposes only. It is current at the date of publication. This content does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be obtained before taking any action based on this publication.


Jaclyn Masters

Senior Associate. Melbourne
+61 3 9672 3428