The ACCC/Metcash decision - What it means in mergers

Article PDF
Subscribe
29 August 2011

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited and Pick n Pay Retailers (Pty) Limited [2011] FCA 967

On 25 August 2011, Justice Emmett of the Federal Court handed down his decision in the ACCC proceedings against Metcash in relation to its proposed acquisition of Franklins, finding in favour of Metcash.

On 1 July 2010, Metcash entered into an agreement to acquire all of the issued shares in Franklins for $215 million. On 17 November 2010, the ACCC announced its decision to oppose the transaction on the basis that it would lead to a substantial lessening of competition in the market for the wholesale supply of packaged groceries to independent supermarkets. Unpersuaded by the ACCC’s analysis in relation to market definition and the impact of the acquisition on competition, Metcash invited the ACCC to commence proceedings and make their case.

The case was decided on the key issues of market definition, the counterfactual (ie the future market structure without the acquisition) and the likely impact of the proposed acquisition on competition. These are some initial thoughts.


Click 'Article PDF' to read the full article.

Related Content

Contacts

Eddie Scuderi

Partner. Brisbane
+61 7 3228 9319

Profile

Mark McCowan

Partner. Melbourne
+61 3 9672 3335

Profile

Richard Flitcroft

Partner. Sydney
+61 2 9210 6435

Profile